Pages

Sunday, October 27, 2013

The Great Bollywood Tamasha

The Great Bollywood Tamasha

The Business of Bollywood has changed rapidly in the post-liberalization era of mass consumerism. Gone are the days when Jubilee Kumars, Kapoors, Khannas and Bachchans would celebrate Silver Jubilee (25 week run) or Golden Jubilee (50 week run) Hits. Today’s Bollywood celebrates weekend hits. Yes, all that a movie needs, in order to recover its budget is to run for any length between 1 weekend and 1 week. If a movie runs for a 2nd week successfully, it crosses the new Holy Grail of the turnstiles – ‘Rs. 100 crore nett.’. For an industry that has for long been criticized for lacking originality and for brazenly ‘lifting’ or ‘being inspired by’ or legally ‘remaking’ films from the ‘South’, this new trend should have engendered a new breed of cinema. But unfortunately this has given them license to churn out more trash than substance.

Bollywood has long suffered the image smear that financers with dubious reputations bring with them. With the studio system in Bollywood having collapsed, only a few established movie production houses remained - Yash Chopra, Subhash Ghai, Rajshri, to name a few. The title of producer would hang loosely on anyone ranging from businessmen to front-men of Dons, operating either from Mumbai or from overseas. Films were a good way to make quick returns or in the worst case, to get rid of excess cash and to schmooze with beauty. But that was still pre-liberalization, license-Raj India, where everything was centrally controlled and among other things, channels of entertainment were in short supply. It was either the ‘good old’ Govt. run DD or a local live act or the comfort of the local single-screen cinema. The Indian was starved for entertainment content.

The economics of Bollywood movie making changed in the 90s due to two parallel forces –                   Ram Gopal Varma in urban India and Mithun Chakraborty in semi-urban and rural India.

Ram Gopal Varma, a maverick director from the ‘South’ shot to prominence with his seminal ‘Shiva’, a powerful story of a young man who stands up to the local crime syndicate in his college and city. Upon his successful cross-over to Bollywood from Telugu-wood, with ‘Rangeela’, Varma started what was called ‘the factory’. The factory was a group of young directors backed by a producer, who would make movies at a quick pace. Some were made by the boss himself with larger budgets and canvas, while many were made by the newbies who were keen on filming hitherto unexplored subjects. Varma was the producer and gave freedom to his young charges to make movies such as ‘Shool’, a movie that explored the difficulty of being honest in the Bihari heartland. Good actors who were not yet celebrities like Manoj Bajpai or fading actresses like Urmila Matondkar and Raveena Tandon were chosen to work on these movies that were shot in a short span of time, at low budgets and released in quick succession.  The costs were spread and the profits accrued to the factory.

Mithun Chakraborty, a 3-time National Award winning actor and a success of the disco-inspired Bollywood era of the 80s had retired to the hills to focus on his Monarch Hotel. In the 90s, Mithun’s Dream Factory produced a slew of movies that were shot in Ooty and nearby locations. The targets were semi-urban and rural centers that would not figure in the distribution radar of big films. Mithun released a staggering 30 films in 1998 and 1999 combined, at a rate of 1 film every 3 weeks. Needless to say, his model worked even though some of his movie titles like ‘Cheetah’, ‘Jallad’ and ‘Ravan Raaj’ made you squirm.

While this happened at the production end of things, another development was afoot on the demand side – cable television. With licenses given to cable operators to offer a multitude of TV channels to the hungry Indian, both domestic as well as international groups like Zee, Star network and Sony entered Bollywood’s scared space. Now you could enjoy tens of channels, some of which played new and old Hindi movies and also Hindi soaps that were elongated and exacerbated versions of Bollywood family dramas. In the language of the economist, Bollywood had to compete with substitute products. One noticeable trend in the 90s was the number of parties that were thrown to celebrate milestones that were passé to the previous generation. A silver jubilee now became 25 days instead of weeks.

The model of the mavericks had to become mainstream now for profitability to be achieved. A variety of Bollywood players embraced the factory model. The corporatization of Bollywood was something Amitabh Bachchan tried his hand at doing with his ABCL in the mid-90s, but he failed to execute profitably and had to file for his company’s bankruptcy. But there are others that have had much success with this.
Production Houses and Distributors started evolving into entertainment business companies that made films, distributed them and also licensed content to cable television and a variety of digital properties on the internet. Production houses such as Yash Raj and Mukta Arts that would hitherto focus on big films made by their owner-directors like Yash Chopra, or Subhash Ghai respectively, now started producing smaller budget films and also embraced distribution of other’s films and of their own. Yash Chopra’s son Aditya has directed only 2 movies in a near-20 year career since 1994’s ‘Dilwale Dulhaniya Lejayenge’ but has produced over 30 since. Subhash Ghai, a prolific film maker in the 80s and 90s has produced 24 movies since the year 2000 but has directed only 2 of them.

Entities like Tips that started out distributing LPs and cassettes entered film production. Companies like Eros that were pure-play distribution companies, have also entered film production, as have corporate players like Anil Ambani whose Reliance Pictures is a key distributor and producer. Star-kids like Karan Johar have revived their father’s production house Dharma Productions, using this model and Ekta Kapoor has successfully entered the fray through the side door of television with her Balaji Telefilms, which is today a listed company. Farhan Akhtar and Ritesh Sidhwani (Excel Entertainment), Aamir Khan (Aamir Khan Productions), Anil Kapoor (Anil Kapoor Productions), Akshay Kumar (Hari Om Productions) and hold your breath – John Abraham (John Abraham productions that made Vicky Donor as its first film) have all jumped the bandwagon.

Along with this transition, the economics of movie making also changed. By selling music rights to a music distribution company, satellite rights to a TV channel and domestic and overseas distribution rights to a distribution company, a producer can recover anywhere between 100 to 50% of the cost of production of his film and even be in profit before the Friday of the release. Now, all that is needed to recover the left over portion is for the film to run for 1 weekend or 1 week. If a producer with deep pockets, who is also a distributor, can afford it, he can distribute thousands of prints and recover the amount with even 50-60% occupancy over a single weekend. Shah Rukh Khan’s Ra.One released with over 2000 prints worldwide across all languages. His 170-crore magnum opus broke even.

The magic of this statistic has also been influenced by the rise of multiplexes and multi-brand retail in India. The multiplex arrived in the new millennium as a collection of smaller theatres that could screen 10 different movies at a time, 5 shows a day. The customer experience had food and beverage to go with comfortable seating, clean and neat movie halls with sound proof walls and Dolby Digital blaring out everything with excellent clarity. The upwardly mobile Indian middle class embraced it. With multi-brand retail, arrived the shopping mall. In every nook and corner of urban and tier-2 India, malls abound, almost always with a multiplex embedded within. Now, the mall becomes not just a shopping center, but a hangout place for the young ‘uns, a family outing spot or just a time pass spot for anyone who has time to kill. The substitute for Bollywood had moved from cable television to other forms of time-pass entertainment.

Now Bollywood films are just one of the options to the 21st century Indian who can choose from TV, IPL, Malls, Video-Game parlors, Go-Karting zones, pubs, restaurants and a slew of other entertainment options. In order to look for that 1 weekend of magic, Bollywood turned to marketing – or more specifically film promotion.

Film promotion is the set of activities that are intended to inform and influence an audience to go and watch the movie. In the earlier generation of Bollywood, films were marketed with hand painted bill boards and posters that were placed at strategic places. Newspapers would carry information about upcoming releases as would theatres. Film Magazines like Filmfare and Star Dust would feature the top stars and also carry tid bits of information on new film releases and would be used as PR channels by movie makers. Today, with the flood of information on the internet and on the street, it is hard for a film to jostle for space in a consumer’s mind. Film promotion as a discipline in itself has evolved enormously over the last 2 decades or so.

Earlier, actors and models occupied separate spaces. Rarely would a Vinod Khanna cross over and do a Cinthol ad or a Sri Devi a Lux ad. In the 90s, Shah Rukh Khan was the first person to break this glass wall between the 2 roles of actor and model, when he started endorsing Hyundai and became the brand ambassador for the first company to challenge Maruti’s monopoly of the Indian 4-wheeler market. Some criticized him, many admired him, but what he did made people realize that the actor is also a brand that can live in a consumer’s mind not just through his film, but through the product he endorses. Advertising centered on the film’s lead actor became an effective channel for film promotion.

Raj Kapoor and Dev Anand had taken a delegation from Bollywood to the USSR with great success in the 50s. Since then Amitabh Bachchan has gone on a few world tours and filled up eminent stadia like Wembley. In the 90s and early 2000s, a new trend of organized world tours started emerging with groups of stars and starlets being taken on these stage performance tours to a single country like the USA or to multiple countries where the Indian diaspora abounded. The idea of going on a promotional tour for a film emerged from these tours.

Now a set of film stars and the director would go from city to city and spend a few hours interacting with the audience telling them about their new film. Aamir Khan, an innovator in film promotion started this trend with ‘Lagaan’. He not only played ‘Lagaan’- inspired cricket matches at cricket stadia around the country but continued to do so even after the film was released. The seeds were sown for theme-based promotions, inspired by the theme of the film.  Now promotional tours and association with events relevant to theme of the film became the norm. The trend of using traditional forms of film promotions like interviews or cover shoots of the hero-heroine continued as well.

With ‘Lagaan’, the seeds were also sown for the master to showcase his latent talent at film promotion. It is not a co-incidence that his films always have innovative and trend-setting promotions that others merely follow. In the 2000s, film promotion became more multi-dimensional than before with the addition of the ‘brand-partner’, a company that would synergistically align with the theme of the film to help its brand and that of the film. This was limited not only to traditional brands like food, drink and clothing, but also digital brands like MSN, Yahoo and others.

The turn of the century also fostered the internet revolution. Bollywood borrowed the micro-site concept that Hollywood uses effectively. Now every movie had a micro-site where fans could go and watch behind the scene pics, movie promotional pics, audio and video content and also interact with the actors. Aamir Khan, his latent promotional talents stirred with ‘Lagaan’ used MSN for ‘Mangal Pandey’, his next film. A look-alike contest was launched with MSN where people could use Mangal Pandey digital props like the long hair and handle bar moustache, superimpose it on their pictures and send it back to be judged. The winner was promised a flight to Mumbai, a meeting with Khan and other goodies.

 For ‘Rang De Basanti’, Khan visited college campuses to bring out the youth-oriented theme of the film. He plays a hanger-on who doesn’t know what to do with himself, in the film. Coca-Cola tied up with the producers to introduce a ‘Piyo Sar Uthake’ to induce pride in the customer. Provogue brought out a clothing line, in keeping with the mood and message of the film. Airtel’s ‘Express Yourself’ was a tagline that aligned with the film and the actors visited a Delhi Campus to promote this very message. Out of the 25 crore production budget of this film, UTV spend a whooping 10 crore on its promotion – a 40% share as compared to the usual 5% typically employed. The film grossed nearly 100 crore worldwide.

The brand association bandwagon saw innovative strategies by other films such as ‘Bunty aur Babli’ which had the protagonists Abhishek Bachchan and Rani Mukherjee read prime time news on NDTV in order to promote their film.

With ‘Ghajini’, promotional took off on another plane, as Ghajini-inspired haircuts were given by Aamir Khan to fans around the country. Radio Mirchi invited calls from people who wanted to line up for the cut. Mannequins replicating his sculpted look were placed in multiplexes all around the country. Using viral marketing, the film’s microsite started a ‘Find Ghajini’ campaign which would challenge the visitor to play the role of Aamir and to find Ghajini using a set of clues. Samsung, a brand that Khan endorses launched a range of Ghajini edition phones. The film turned out to be a box office smash and grossed 190 crore worldwide.

Even for a small budget film like ‘Delhi Belly’, a film which faced a lot of criticism before its release due to its abusive language, Khan brought out a series of ‘inverse marketing’ television ads with the protagonists of the film actually asking the audience not to see the film because it had words like bleep and words like bleep and other words like bleep. His wife Kiran Rao shot a set of music videos for the songs of the film which were licensed to MTV and other music channels to play out. A small budget film, ‘Delhi Belly’ went on to gross nearly 100 crore worldwide. He did the same with ‘Dhobi Ghat’ where he told people not to throng the theatres to watch him, because he wanted them to go based on the perceived merit of the film, not his own. Made on a budget of 10 crore, the movie went on to make 14 crore, a good performance for an artsy movie.

In keeping with the satirical theme of ‘Peepli Live’, Khan introduced a TV promo which poked fun at him. A reporter was broadcasting from a fictional village of Peepli from a shop which had biscuit and wafer packets with Aamir Khan’s imagery on them. She says that Aamir Khan will end up selling biscuits and wafers with his name if this film doesn’t do well. Once she goes off air, she is shown telling the shop keeper that Aamir Khan must be mad to make a film like this. The film grossed 3 times its budget.

With innovations such as these, that have spawned a countless remakes, film promotion today is a well-oiled and multi-player ecosystem with companies across retail, automotive, publishing, internet, broadcast, print and social media working together to promote a film.

Of the 1255 films released in 2011, 206 were Bollywood films. Taran Adarsh, the Bollywood trade analyst regularly brings out his ‘Diwali to Diwali’ report. He states that, from Diwali 2010 to Diwali 2011, 206 Bollywood movies released, but only 5 were big hits and 5 were good successes. This is less than 1% of the total number of releases. Clearly, while the business of Bollywood has evolved to make sure that no one loses money, it has not translated into improving the quality of cinema that one expects from the nation’s highest movie producing industry. It is also the 100th year since Raja Harishchandra. 

1 comment: